Attraction; Are you programmed to limit your choices based on face stereotypes?
Parents, peers and school societies program people to only date people who are genetically formed with the same facial and body structure. This creates objectified relationships which often end in cheating, "who-used-who" accusations, viscous divorce lawsuits, etc.. the point is: "go outside your comfort area and avoid being driven into a bubble.
Dating sites promote themselves using photos of stereotype-looking people. Don't buy in to the programming, read the profile before you look at the pictures if you can possibly bring yourself to do so.
Sunny writes: "Internet dating puts the pictures up at the top so you just click through like shopping at the store. It dehumanizes people and sets up a "hook-up" decision-making process. Turn off images in your browser and just read the profiles if you are not just looking for sex."
Pam says: "Any woman who is not a teenager who has her breasts or cleavage showing in her profile picture is selling it and knows exactly what she is doing and should expect exactly what she gets online."
Robert says: " If there are no full-length shots in the profile and the profile says "curvy" or "average", you know what you know. Don't be surprised".
Parents, peers and school societies program people to only date people who are genetically formed with the same facial and body structure. This creates objectified relationships which often end in cheating, "who-used-who" accusations, viscous divorce lawsuits, etc.. the point is: "go outside your comfort area and avoid being driven into a bubble.
Dating sites promote themselves using photos of stereotype-looking people. Don't buy in to the programming, read the profile before you look at the pictures if you can possibly bring yourself to do so.
Sunny writes: "Internet dating puts the pictures up at the top so you just click through like shopping at the store. It dehumanizes people and sets up a "hook-up" decision-making process. Turn off images in your browser and just read the profiles if you are not just looking for sex."
Pam says: "Any woman who is not a teenager who has her breasts or cleavage showing in her profile picture is selling it and knows exactly what she is doing and should expect exactly what she gets online."
Robert says: " If there are no full-length shots in the profile and the profile says "curvy" or "average", you know what you know. Don't be surprised".
FROM the ANTI-GOLD-DIGGER SITE regarding facial programming:
Paula tells us: "Fraternities and Sororities exist to breed genetic model ideals. "Ivy-League" schools exist for rich families and family-controlled business to control mating limits. Parents of women who are "sent to" Ivy League schools want those women to get the "Mrs." and not their "Master's," in many cases. They say it is about "marrying your peers" yet most men from Ivy League schools turn into abusers, white collar felons and buy at least 4 mistresses and treat women as trophy wife property."
Delianne writes: "Stanford University went to great lengths to promote "proper" in-breeding and University Avenue hook-ups with the right students from the right Greek systems, I feel used and abused by what they did to me now."
Randy Says: "Sororities & Frat houses create a stirring call for the genetically gifted to band together and form an Aryan-like Master Race. Retrogressive image-controlled mating is the target of Yale, Stanford, Princeton and similar puppy farms for yuppies. Women who have idealized model-like faces are emotionally punished if they do not date a guy who has GQ-looking aquiline facial features. Those women who do not have such features are encouraged to get surgically cut and modified to try to achieve them. Then they are all locked in a bubble to avoid outside perceptions, depth or any awareness further than 2 feet from their Land-Rover or BMW. If you don't have the Playboy/GQ "look" it is off to the social ovens for you."
Della says: "Owners of companies in the Ivy-League breeding pond will not hire those who do not have the plastic yuppie/hipster/Master Race "look" for fear of tainting the pond because everyone sleeps with each other at yuppie start-ups."
Penny Writes: "Susan Patton's famous letter in the daily Princetonian telling girls to bag one in an Ivy League school or you will be left out of the good breeding stock, The Atlantic article on "Why Women Still Can't Have It All", and the "Lean In" controversy show that we have a long way to go."
Pam Says: "The read Pride & Prejudice as if it is Ann Landers. They refer to their "station in life" as if humans are property. It is a sick society that Ivy League people come from.
Stocker says: Everybody in the Guardsmen and the Spinsters that I ever met, that got married had a mistress on the side or got into white collar anti-anxiety drug addiction. Nobody survived that routine yet everyone of them fakes it until the cows come home and they tell everyone, in public, that everything is "perfect". The main rule is: "Do all the evil you want, use each other as career tools but never, ever, ever let it show in public". Stepford Wives are the result.
Darlene says: "Yuppie guys gain power at work, and personal ego-maniac points by showing how much they can cheat and not get caught. The handsomer they are, the more they cheat because they know they can and want to always prove it to themselves and their bros. Marry an ugly guy if you want fidelity".
Rogerson says: "At our Frat House at Stanford they bring mini-buses out at night and we send them to Stanford Sorority Houses to pick up hot girls who are very drunk. The administration at Stanford supports the buses because they say it "prevents drunk driving", but everybody knows it is to keep the "right girls" on the "right guys" from the big families. The girls get on the buses because they want to be in the in-crowd who gets to sleep with Stanford Bachelors for their careers. The Sorority leaders never let the "wrong looking girls" (non-preppy/non-cheerleader looking girls) into the Sororities, so the bloodlines are kept pure."
Paula tells us: "Fraternities and Sororities exist to breed genetic model ideals. "Ivy-League" schools exist for rich families and family-controlled business to control mating limits. Parents of women who are "sent to" Ivy League schools want those women to get the "Mrs." and not their "Master's," in many cases. They say it is about "marrying your peers" yet most men from Ivy League schools turn into abusers, white collar felons and buy at least 4 mistresses and treat women as trophy wife property."
Delianne writes: "Stanford University went to great lengths to promote "proper" in-breeding and University Avenue hook-ups with the right students from the right Greek systems, I feel used and abused by what they did to me now."
Randy Says: "Sororities & Frat houses create a stirring call for the genetically gifted to band together and form an Aryan-like Master Race. Retrogressive image-controlled mating is the target of Yale, Stanford, Princeton and similar puppy farms for yuppies. Women who have idealized model-like faces are emotionally punished if they do not date a guy who has GQ-looking aquiline facial features. Those women who do not have such features are encouraged to get surgically cut and modified to try to achieve them. Then they are all locked in a bubble to avoid outside perceptions, depth or any awareness further than 2 feet from their Land-Rover or BMW. If you don't have the Playboy/GQ "look" it is off to the social ovens for you."
Della says: "Owners of companies in the Ivy-League breeding pond will not hire those who do not have the plastic yuppie/hipster/Master Race "look" for fear of tainting the pond because everyone sleeps with each other at yuppie start-ups."
Penny Writes: "Susan Patton's famous letter in the daily Princetonian telling girls to bag one in an Ivy League school or you will be left out of the good breeding stock, The Atlantic article on "Why Women Still Can't Have It All", and the "Lean In" controversy show that we have a long way to go."
Pam Says: "The read Pride & Prejudice as if it is Ann Landers. They refer to their "station in life" as if humans are property. It is a sick society that Ivy League people come from.
Stocker says: Everybody in the Guardsmen and the Spinsters that I ever met, that got married had a mistress on the side or got into white collar anti-anxiety drug addiction. Nobody survived that routine yet everyone of them fakes it until the cows come home and they tell everyone, in public, that everything is "perfect". The main rule is: "Do all the evil you want, use each other as career tools but never, ever, ever let it show in public". Stepford Wives are the result.
Darlene says: "Yuppie guys gain power at work, and personal ego-maniac points by showing how much they can cheat and not get caught. The handsomer they are, the more they cheat because they know they can and want to always prove it to themselves and their bros. Marry an ugly guy if you want fidelity".
Rogerson says: "At our Frat House at Stanford they bring mini-buses out at night and we send them to Stanford Sorority Houses to pick up hot girls who are very drunk. The administration at Stanford supports the buses because they say it "prevents drunk driving", but everybody knows it is to keep the "right girls" on the "right guys" from the big families. The girls get on the buses because they want to be in the in-crowd who gets to sleep with Stanford Bachelors for their careers. The Sorority leaders never let the "wrong looking girls" (non-preppy/non-cheerleader looking girls) into the Sororities, so the bloodlines are kept pure."
Here is the Stanford Put-on Graphic that is circling the web:
The Above picture was sent to us by a University Club. What do you think of it?
You may be a tool of the media. If you are “attractive” you go for people (without looking for depth) who always use you and dump you as they search for attraction without depth. Science says that women with “model attractive” aquiline facial features will usually fail in love unless they pick the least “model attractive” man with non-aquiline facial features that they can find because two model attractive people generally do not develop the depth or intent beyond appearance and only see the lack of the depth after the superficial comfort has worn off.
Other examples of pre-programming are documented in the TV series and text of:
Discovery Channel’s Science of Sex Appeal- Cliff Notes:
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/science-of-sex-appeal/
Here are the results of the scientific studies conducted by Discovery Channel:
The bottom line, based on over one hundred years of research by thousands of different entities: “What people think they want is wrong if they are looking for anything more than just sex” Your subconscious biological programming will ONLY steer you to “make more humans”, it WILL NOT allow you to pick a relationship partner. It will make you pick someone who is cute and mostly totally wrong for you. This is why 90% of dating experiences never work out and 70% of marriages end in divorce. Online dating causes most of the people that SHOULD be together to not get picked because the main choosing process is picture-based.
* Social, media and genetic programming makes you do things you do not mean to do in the dating process. To be successful in dating you have to actually NOT go with your “intuition” or “first impressions” because science now shows us that it is a TRICK. Science now shows that reacting to pictures only, online, will only get you great sex and NEVER get you a deep or long lasting relationship.
* You will not pick a person whose eye separation and distance from nose to brow is not the same as yours unless you consciously make yourself only look at the person in profile view. You unconsciously judge attraction based on equilateral positioning of all facial elements and geometric distances between points on the face.
* Women are generally repelled by men’s scent (except when they are within a day or two of ovulation)...
* One research study illustrated that women tend to choose partners based on status or resources as a priority. Groups of women, selected at random, were shown photos of similarly dressed men of relatively equal attractiveness. Following a baseline numerical rating of attractiveness, later groups were shown the same pictures, but with an indication of social and economic status -- five- or six-figure incomes. The attractiveness ratings rose or fell significantly in direct correlation to perceived income level. Men put fins and flames on their cars and wear giant watches in order to create status-attraction to attract women.
* When women are ovulating; their voices change to a higher pitch to attract men, their skin tone changes to attract men, their pelvic muscles tighten to create a shimmer walk, they interpret smells different and they output different kinds of attracting odors.
* The more a man sways his shoulders in a swagger, the more women will be attracted to him. The more a woman sways her hips, the more men will be attracted to her.
* And the science of partner selection continues with human odor as a factor. Couples can discern the special smell of their partner. Every man has a unique smell -- 'eau de man.' Research has demonstrated that odor affects us at a subconscious level. We can't control it. No two people smell the same or have the same ‘HMC’, as it is called. There is an optimum match for HMC.
* Women are generally repelled by men’s scent (except when they are within a day or two of ovulation); but men, when exposed to vaginal secretions, are consistently attracted. In experiments where men inhale imperceptible low doses of artificial copulants, the attractiveness rating of women shown in pictures is higher. Copulants impair men’s ability to discriminate whether a woman is attractive. The scent of copulants prevents them from thinking clearly. (Odor also helps us steer clear of relatives and has performed the evolutionary role of "incest avoidance.")
* With chemistry-inspired flirting, lust, and love all continuously active below our level of consciousness, can we maintain attraction to one partner? Attraction has many stages, beginning with a single biochemical jolt resulting in a change reaction. Anecdotal reports indicate the ‘first kiss’ is highly memorable in the attraction that builds (or fails to build). The abundant testosterone in saliva increases the sex drive.
* Men are genetically programmed at the core of their genes for tens of millions of years to sleep with as many women as possible in order to keep the species going. Just as women are programmed to want a baby like crazy as soon as they turn 18. A good college education or strict parents are not going to change this. Recent science has found a shot that can cause monogamy in men and a shot that can cause baby anxiety reduction in women.
* Even more sex appeal chemistry influences occur through the dopamine triggered in our brains. Dopamine is the brain’s pleasure chemical that produces a high that can be addictive, energy producing, and exhilarating. Biochemistry shows the link between dopamine and testosterone with exhilaration and lust. But dopamine is not uniquely linked to sex appeal. The thrill of sports, bungee jumping for instance, can produce a dopamine rush. What about love?
* Many of our unconscious preferences and behaviors are conditioned by our chemistry. Studies report that women find slightly feminized pictures of the same man more attractive when they are not ovulating. Married women are biologically driven to promiscuous behavior as reported by an experiment based on digital movies of the female participants dancing during a "girls’ night out." The women with long term partners and on their fertility cycles were the most provocative. This was concluded from movement and appearance analyzed through pixels and an estimated percentage of skin showing. These committed women sent out more sexual signals than the available ones. In contrast, other research pinpoints the role of the chemical oxytocin in monogamy for women.
* Many of our unconscious preferences and behaviors are conditioned by our chemistry. Studies report that women find slightly feminized pictures of the same man more attractive when they are not ovulating. Married women are biologically driven to promiscuous behavior as reported by an experiment based on digital movies of the female participants dancing during a "girls’ night out." The women with long term partners and on their fertility cycles were the most provocative. This was concluded from movement and appearance analyzed through pixels and an estimated percentage of skin showing. These committed women sent out more sexual signals than the available ones. In contrast, other research pinpoints the role of the chemical oxytocin in monogamy for women.
* The science on sexual attraction claims that evolution prepares us to stay together just long enough to raise children. One study across 58 societies demonstrated a dual reproductive system going from pair bonding to straying at about the four-year mark in a relationship. The study conclusion: we are fundamentally built to stray. Does this mean that our exhilarating experience of early love is destined to be undermined by our inherent biology? Will we always fail at long-term love?
* Men put flame decals, fins, large spoilers, giant speakers, and raised tires on their cars to draw the attention of women in order to seek to demonstrate that they have a higher ability to acquire goods and survive in the urban jungle.
* Science claims that the chemistry of passion, lust, and love bind us together for a limited period of time. Haven't most of us figured that out at a personal level? My observation is we already know we need to build for the future before the reality storm hits. Yet many of us neglect our marriages and relationships anyway. Over focus on careers or children, and overindulging in our selfish habits through individual use of time frequently lead to rampant neglect of our partners. Science help us? Dr. Karl Letus says: "Love is like Santa Clause and Fairies. You want to believe in them but they don't actually exist. What is worse is that love is an actual sickness. Santa Clause and the Fairies can be dismissed as mere whimsy but love is a medical addiction to chemicals in the brain and also a psychological addiction to being controlled and to out-sourcing personal security services. Chocolate is used to encourage love because it caused lubrication of the neuron thought process in your head. Expensive gifts are sought by women, from men, in order to validate the intent and ability of the man to provide ongoing financial and physical security services. So, by now, some of you are reading this and having an anger reaction and thinking.. "oh you are spoiling it, I still believe, I still believe.." just about the same reaction you get when you tell a smoker or an alcholic that they are addicted and destroying themselves. " This is the harshest view of Love. It is just one scientist's opinion.
* It takes just three minutes to fall in love, scientists revealed today. What the heart wants, it can establish fairly quickly, according to American psychologists who studied the behavior of 10,500 newly-introduced couples. “Some people say they’re looking for one kind of person, then choose another. Others say they don’t even know what they’re looking for,” said Robert Urban of the University of Pennsylvania. “But our data suggest that, however it happens, people know it quickly when they see it.” He claimed would-be lovers generally understand their own worth on the dating market, and so are able to judge potential compatibility within moments of meeting. Psychologists analyzed the interactions between speed-dating participants, where men and women are given just three minutes to assess each other before moving on to the next person. At the end of a session each individual indicates which of the 25 or so people he or she met they would like to see again. “Although they had three minutes, most participants made their decision based on the information that they probably got in the first three seconds,” Urban said. “Somewhat surprisingly, factors that you might think would be really important to people, like religion, education and income, played very little role in their choices.” Psychologists have often likened relationships to transactions whereby people select mates based on the qualities their other half has to offer, such as power and money.
Other examples of pre-programming are documented in the TV series and text of:
Discovery Channel’s Science of Sex Appeal- Cliff Notes:
http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/science-of-sex-appeal/
Here are the results of the scientific studies conducted by Discovery Channel:
The bottom line, based on over one hundred years of research by thousands of different entities: “What people think they want is wrong if they are looking for anything more than just sex” Your subconscious biological programming will ONLY steer you to “make more humans”, it WILL NOT allow you to pick a relationship partner. It will make you pick someone who is cute and mostly totally wrong for you. This is why 90% of dating experiences never work out and 70% of marriages end in divorce. Online dating causes most of the people that SHOULD be together to not get picked because the main choosing process is picture-based.
* Social, media and genetic programming makes you do things you do not mean to do in the dating process. To be successful in dating you have to actually NOT go with your “intuition” or “first impressions” because science now shows us that it is a TRICK. Science now shows that reacting to pictures only, online, will only get you great sex and NEVER get you a deep or long lasting relationship.
* You will not pick a person whose eye separation and distance from nose to brow is not the same as yours unless you consciously make yourself only look at the person in profile view. You unconsciously judge attraction based on equilateral positioning of all facial elements and geometric distances between points on the face.
* Women are generally repelled by men’s scent (except when they are within a day or two of ovulation)...
* One research study illustrated that women tend to choose partners based on status or resources as a priority. Groups of women, selected at random, were shown photos of similarly dressed men of relatively equal attractiveness. Following a baseline numerical rating of attractiveness, later groups were shown the same pictures, but with an indication of social and economic status -- five- or six-figure incomes. The attractiveness ratings rose or fell significantly in direct correlation to perceived income level. Men put fins and flames on their cars and wear giant watches in order to create status-attraction to attract women.
* When women are ovulating; their voices change to a higher pitch to attract men, their skin tone changes to attract men, their pelvic muscles tighten to create a shimmer walk, they interpret smells different and they output different kinds of attracting odors.
* The more a man sways his shoulders in a swagger, the more women will be attracted to him. The more a woman sways her hips, the more men will be attracted to her.
* And the science of partner selection continues with human odor as a factor. Couples can discern the special smell of their partner. Every man has a unique smell -- 'eau de man.' Research has demonstrated that odor affects us at a subconscious level. We can't control it. No two people smell the same or have the same ‘HMC’, as it is called. There is an optimum match for HMC.
* Women are generally repelled by men’s scent (except when they are within a day or two of ovulation); but men, when exposed to vaginal secretions, are consistently attracted. In experiments where men inhale imperceptible low doses of artificial copulants, the attractiveness rating of women shown in pictures is higher. Copulants impair men’s ability to discriminate whether a woman is attractive. The scent of copulants prevents them from thinking clearly. (Odor also helps us steer clear of relatives and has performed the evolutionary role of "incest avoidance.")
* With chemistry-inspired flirting, lust, and love all continuously active below our level of consciousness, can we maintain attraction to one partner? Attraction has many stages, beginning with a single biochemical jolt resulting in a change reaction. Anecdotal reports indicate the ‘first kiss’ is highly memorable in the attraction that builds (or fails to build). The abundant testosterone in saliva increases the sex drive.
* Men are genetically programmed at the core of their genes for tens of millions of years to sleep with as many women as possible in order to keep the species going. Just as women are programmed to want a baby like crazy as soon as they turn 18. A good college education or strict parents are not going to change this. Recent science has found a shot that can cause monogamy in men and a shot that can cause baby anxiety reduction in women.
* Even more sex appeal chemistry influences occur through the dopamine triggered in our brains. Dopamine is the brain’s pleasure chemical that produces a high that can be addictive, energy producing, and exhilarating. Biochemistry shows the link between dopamine and testosterone with exhilaration and lust. But dopamine is not uniquely linked to sex appeal. The thrill of sports, bungee jumping for instance, can produce a dopamine rush. What about love?
* Many of our unconscious preferences and behaviors are conditioned by our chemistry. Studies report that women find slightly feminized pictures of the same man more attractive when they are not ovulating. Married women are biologically driven to promiscuous behavior as reported by an experiment based on digital movies of the female participants dancing during a "girls’ night out." The women with long term partners and on their fertility cycles were the most provocative. This was concluded from movement and appearance analyzed through pixels and an estimated percentage of skin showing. These committed women sent out more sexual signals than the available ones. In contrast, other research pinpoints the role of the chemical oxytocin in monogamy for women.
* Many of our unconscious preferences and behaviors are conditioned by our chemistry. Studies report that women find slightly feminized pictures of the same man more attractive when they are not ovulating. Married women are biologically driven to promiscuous behavior as reported by an experiment based on digital movies of the female participants dancing during a "girls’ night out." The women with long term partners and on their fertility cycles were the most provocative. This was concluded from movement and appearance analyzed through pixels and an estimated percentage of skin showing. These committed women sent out more sexual signals than the available ones. In contrast, other research pinpoints the role of the chemical oxytocin in monogamy for women.
* The science on sexual attraction claims that evolution prepares us to stay together just long enough to raise children. One study across 58 societies demonstrated a dual reproductive system going from pair bonding to straying at about the four-year mark in a relationship. The study conclusion: we are fundamentally built to stray. Does this mean that our exhilarating experience of early love is destined to be undermined by our inherent biology? Will we always fail at long-term love?
* Men put flame decals, fins, large spoilers, giant speakers, and raised tires on their cars to draw the attention of women in order to seek to demonstrate that they have a higher ability to acquire goods and survive in the urban jungle.
* Science claims that the chemistry of passion, lust, and love bind us together for a limited period of time. Haven't most of us figured that out at a personal level? My observation is we already know we need to build for the future before the reality storm hits. Yet many of us neglect our marriages and relationships anyway. Over focus on careers or children, and overindulging in our selfish habits through individual use of time frequently lead to rampant neglect of our partners. Science help us? Dr. Karl Letus says: "Love is like Santa Clause and Fairies. You want to believe in them but they don't actually exist. What is worse is that love is an actual sickness. Santa Clause and the Fairies can be dismissed as mere whimsy but love is a medical addiction to chemicals in the brain and also a psychological addiction to being controlled and to out-sourcing personal security services. Chocolate is used to encourage love because it caused lubrication of the neuron thought process in your head. Expensive gifts are sought by women, from men, in order to validate the intent and ability of the man to provide ongoing financial and physical security services. So, by now, some of you are reading this and having an anger reaction and thinking.. "oh you are spoiling it, I still believe, I still believe.." just about the same reaction you get when you tell a smoker or an alcholic that they are addicted and destroying themselves. " This is the harshest view of Love. It is just one scientist's opinion.
* It takes just three minutes to fall in love, scientists revealed today. What the heart wants, it can establish fairly quickly, according to American psychologists who studied the behavior of 10,500 newly-introduced couples. “Some people say they’re looking for one kind of person, then choose another. Others say they don’t even know what they’re looking for,” said Robert Urban of the University of Pennsylvania. “But our data suggest that, however it happens, people know it quickly when they see it.” He claimed would-be lovers generally understand their own worth on the dating market, and so are able to judge potential compatibility within moments of meeting. Psychologists analyzed the interactions between speed-dating participants, where men and women are given just three minutes to assess each other before moving on to the next person. At the end of a session each individual indicates which of the 25 or so people he or she met they would like to see again. “Although they had three minutes, most participants made their decision based on the information that they probably got in the first three seconds,” Urban said. “Somewhat surprisingly, factors that you might think would be really important to people, like religion, education and income, played very little role in their choices.” Psychologists have often likened relationships to transactions whereby people select mates based on the qualities their other half has to offer, such as power and money.
Ladies: Don't be this person: http://MillValleyConfidential.weebly.com
Men: Don't be this person: http://www.datingtrek.com/stop-attracting-jerks.php
Men: Don't be this person: http://www.datingtrek.com/stop-attracting-jerks.php